Kappa Omicron
Nu
FORUM
INTRODUCTION
As humanitys ability to inflict damage on people
and the earth keeps growing, it becomes more important than ever that our students learn to think critically and
envision ways to improve their communities and societies. Modern communication brings world-wide events to our
attention as they happen, but also bombards us with 10-second sound bites that tell only part of the truth. The
pressures of everyday life allow less and less time for thoughtful reflection and meaningful dialogue. Students, as
future world citizens, need to learn to make reasoned judgments in light of the facts available. Clayton (2003)[1] quoting Minnich, offers these descriptions:
[critical thinking] is exploratory, suggestive, it does not prove anything, or finally arrive anywhere. [Critical
thinkers] are open-minded, reflective, challengingmore likely to question than to assert, inclined to listen to
many sides, capable of making distinctions that hold differences in play rather than dividing in order to exclude, and
desirous of persuading others rather than reducing them to silence by refuting them. They continue the search for
information to improve themselves and their world.
Individuals need to be open to new ways of thinking,
and to be open to transformative learning. It may mean seeing the world and their place in it differently. It may mean
recognizing the larger social structures that oppress them and how they could overcome these barriers.
Three articles in this issue show students learning
critical thinking in the classroom as major step towards transforming aspects of their lives. Kienzler and Smith focus
on a family and consumer sciences classroom where students learn critical thinking as a way to transform their thinking
about family social issues. Quotes from videotapes of students class dialogues and role-plays provide evidence of
this classs thinking process. Class dialogue and student journals show that to be effective critical thinkers,
students must continue to practice being questioning and reflective as they learn from differing points of view.
Klemme and Rommel describe the use of Reform
Organization of Welfare (ROWEL) to help students develop empathy for individuals living in poverty. Students in two
summer school classes engaged in the experience with the help of 17 community residents representing community
agencies. The three-hour experience had students assume the role of families in poverty as they make decisions about
life issues such as food, housing, and medical care. Students attitudes changed in transportation, isolation,
time, rules, self-esteem, jobs, and illegal activities of the poor. They learned the many ways society takes advantage
of the poor.
Thin proposes an opportunity to promote transformative
learning in a hospitality management class that uses case studies to promote problem-solving skills related to
real-life hospitality scenarios. The new way of thinking would link profit objectives with the promotion of socially
responsible and ethical practices in the hospitality business.
In the fourth article McGregor presents her personal
story of the transformative process. She indicates that a transformed teacher/learner develops the capacity to be
adaptive, more open to other points of view, and increasingly self-aware. She contends that if individuals acquire new
habits of mind and differing points of view, their practice will transform itself because we teach who we are.
Not only must graduates of higher education have
critical thinking skills, but they need to practice these through their commitment to continued life-long learning.
Critical thinking and transformative learning combine cognitive knowledge with affective feelings and emotions. The
world could be a better place if its citizens questioned more, cared for each other more, and lived more in tune with
their immediate and world-wide surroundings.
[1] Clayton, M. (2003, Oct. 14). Rethinking thinking. Christian Science Monitor, 95(223), 18-23.
Accessed at www.csmonitor.com/2003/1014/p18s01-leh.html, on 1/21/04.
|