Abstract
This study examined whether high school students found the Career Education
course they took beneficial to them in regard to life skills, career
selection, and other course work. The students perceived the value related to
career selection. They also felt that the
course was and will be of benefit to them, but the benefits related to life
skills and application to other course work were not understood as well.
Introduction
Research Statement
The purpose of this study was to determine whether high school students found
the Career Education course they took beneficial to them in regard to life
skills, career selection, and other course work.
The career development courses focus on awareness, exploration, and
preparation for careers and the career world (Vocational Instructional
Materials Laboratory, 1999). The
study was designed to provide valuable information about whether or not the benefits of this
curriculum were understood by the students who were taking the course. Similar
classes have been offered on the college level and these students thought that
their course had many positive features (Hayden & Ley, 1997).
Secondary students were not sure if FCS courses should be part of their
requirement for graduation (Cory, Etheridge, Hall, Jones, & Smith, 1998),
but this is becoming part of the curriculum in many high schools today.
Since these classes are new to the high school there has been an
insufficient amount of information gathered on the career classes offered in
the high schools. The hypothesis
of this study is that a majority of students understand several of the
benefits they gain from the class and evaluate the course positively.
Limitations of the Study
Due to time constraints the sample used in this research had not
finished the entire semester-long course of Life Planning.
Since the students had an additional five to six weeks left in the
course they might not have understood all of the course objectives that had
been presented to them and certainly none of the future objectives.
All of the students included in the sample came from one high school.
Each school teaches the curriculum differently and calls its Career
Education course by a different name.
Definition of Terms
The following terms used in this study were defined as:
1. Career Education Course: a class offered by the
FCS (or Home Economics) Department of a high school in which students examine
different career paths they could choose among.
2. Life Planning Course: an elective Career
Education Course offered by Madison Comprehensive High School.
3. School-to-Work Program:
a governmental policy on the preparation of students for employment.
4. Career Pathways: the six categories that Ohio�s career focused curriculum
used to divide and group all of the possible careers that a student could
choose.
5. Career-Focused
Education: Educational
programming in which the curriculum content and learning experiences clearly
connect to the world of work (Vocational Instructional Materials Laboratory,
1999, p. 38).
Review Of
Literature
Recently,
the School-to-Work program has been implemented in the schools; this was the
seed of a reformation in career education.
The Family and Consumer Sciences Departments of Ohio high schools have
begun teaching career education as a class within their curriculum to better
meet the needs of their students.
The School-To-Work
Program
The School-to-Work program in one form or another has been in effect since the
beginning of this century (Savickas, 1999.)
The goals of the career education programs have been to ease the
transition from the classroom to the world of work and prepare the
student for employment. For this
program to be successful, not only should the school be involved, but also the
community and employers (Crowson, Wong, & Aypay, 2000).
Education has always been a means to gain knowledge for work and other
life opportunities. With the
career/job opportunities becoming more diverse it is time to move from a
standardized education to a customized education that allows the student to
see and participate in more real- world applications.
The Law
On May 4, 1994, President Bill Clinton signed the School-to-Work
Opportunities Act. The goal of
this Act was to create temporary funding for school-to-work programs.
By creating temporary funding, the government intended for the schools
to adopt this educational reform and create other funds through businesses and
other sources to continue their particular School-to-Work program (Guest,
& Charles, 2000.) Unfortunately,
not very many of these programs have become self-sufficient, and the funding
will come to an end in 2001.
School districts had the option to decide how involved they would
become in the School-to-Work program. Depending
on the types of programs they offered in their school district, they could
receive full or partial funding of the seven hundred million dollars that had
been set aside for the School-to-Work program (Gray, 2000.) All programs had to start by the seventh grade (Gray, 2000)
and each student must state a career major by the beginning of eleventh grade.
The program also had to include three different parts called core
elements. These elements
consisted of school-based learning, work-based learning, and connecting
activities (Guest, 2000.)
The curriculum within the School-to-Work program must integrate both
academic and vocational learning processes.
Students are required to participate in evaluations where they identify
their own strengths and weaknesses in academics and the need to obtain
additional vocational skills (Gray, 2000.)
The goal is to get away from tracking college bound students and
provide all students with academic and work place skills.
A skills certificate could be earned by the student and would identify
him or her as having obtained specific skills related to a particular
occupation.
Students are also given mentors to help them with work-based
activities. The mentor acts as a
liaison and relates information among the student, school, employer and
parents (Gray, 2000.) This gives
the student the opportunity to participate in real-world activities, and
evaluations are more authentic. Gray
also stated that the act provides no provisions for the education of
interpersonal skills, and without these skills in the world of work students
might find themselves being dismissed from their jobs.
History/Call to Action
The education we have been providing students has not matched the
employment needs of our country. In
the last several years there has been a decline in traditional high-status
jobs (Gordon, 2000.) One-third of
students expect to be a professional, ten percent expect to be a sports or
entertainment star, and another ten percent expect to be doctors (Gordon,
2000.) What these students do not
know is that seventy percent of good jobs will not require the traditional
four-year college education; instead they will require an associate degree or a
technical training certificate (Gordon, 2000.)
Gordon states that most of the new jobs over the next ten years will be
created by the service, craft, and technical industries.
One-third of all college graduates will be unable to obtain employment
that matches their degree, and those with graduate degrees will out number
employment opportunities by fifty percent (Gordon, 2000.)
Currently there are 190,000 technical jobs vacant, and businesses have
an increasing need for high-tech employees.
With this knowledge in mind, it is time to adapt the educational
objectives of our students and prepare them for the changing work force.
Students that are graduating today do not have the math, reading, and
technology skills to even succeed at a production job (Gordon, 2000). This means that not only do we need to focus the education
reform on career skills, but also on academics.
Schools have struggled to be responsive to the technology needs of the
work world, but often the technology that is available in the schools has been
outdated and teachers do not know how to use it.
Application
There are several theories on the application of this program that
focus on how to gain experiences that can become marketable skills (Krumboltz
& Worthington, 1999). These
theories involve the participation of local governments, labor unions, higher
education institutions, industry councils, businesses, the community, and
parents. The first theory holds
that investing in education will increase the human capital
aptitude and skills, therefore increasing the nation�s economic well-being (Krumboltz
& Worthington, 1999). This
theory is based on the fact that workers who have better educational
backgrounds do better in the job market, and countries who have larger pools
of human capital tend to be more competitive in the world�s economy.
The human capital theory calls for the School-to-Work program to
produce a workforce that is highly productive and technologically
sophisticated. Students are
taught through objectives that include training activities, goal setting for career, and
completion of high school with a diploma and a skills certificate (Krumboltz
& Worthington, 1999.) Some of
the limitations of this theory match those of the vocational programs.
The economic focus of this theory loses sight of the academic
excellence schools focus on; instead it focuses on the credentials the
students should be trying to obtain for their skills certificate.
The next theory presented by Krumboltz and Worthington (1999) is the
learning theory, which was derived from Bandura�s social learning theory.
This theory recognizes that students� skills, values, and interest
change as students continue to learn and interact with their surroundings. With this theory students are required to examine their definition of a
satisfying life, then their education focuses on learning the qualities that
can increase the student�s chances at success.
In the career exploration of a student, he or she is usually given some
type of assessment. If students
are locked into the results of one of these assessments, then they are not
given the chance to explore other interests or learn new skills.
Instead, the learning theory approach will ask students what new
interests or skills they would like to develop. This approach does not narrow the career exploration, but
expands it. One of the
limitations of this theory is the use of assessments because schools might
try to focus learning on the identified interests and skills, instead of
expanding upon them and offering new learning experiences (Krumboltz &
Worthington, 1999).
Ohio�s FCS Career-Focused Education
Family and Consumer Sciences Educators
recognized the gap between the life skills they were teaching and the
transition students made to the work world. FCS educators understand the
importance of academic subjects, but they also understand the importance and
need of being able to function in life (Austin, 2000). The core curriculum
addresses many of the life issues a student will face. This is done through six
core subjects, and career education comes under the subject of life planning.
History/ Call to Action
Smith, Hall, Jones, Cory, and Etheridge (1998) claimed that the human
capital on which America builds its future is its students. Even students can see the relevance of learning job skills
and recognizing that they are lacking in these skills (Smith et. al, 1998).
FCS also recognizes the need for these skills in a world that is
changing rapidly, possesses new priorities, and has higher expectations from
its workers (Ohio Department of Education, 1999b).
Career education has become a necessity for all learners.
FCS saw an immediate need for �skills needed to compete in the global
marketplace, credentials based on industry standards, capabilities needed to
successfully enter, compete in, and advance through the present and future
work force, and knowledge and skills for lifelong learning� (Ohio Department
of Education, 1999b. p. 2).
FCS Curriculum
The Ohio the FCS curriculum is comprised of six core areas that include
personal development, resource management, nutrition and wellness, family
relations, life planning, and parenting (Ohio Department of Education, 1998).
FCS teachers have become facilitators to their students while they are
constructing knowledge within the FCS curriculum.
Within each of the six core areas, similar concepts are taught to the
student, including process skills, practical problem solving, and
practical action. These concepts
have made presenting the FCS curriculum easier in the critical science
perspective (Ohio Department of Education, 1998.)
The process skills are broken down into four processes consisting of
managing work and family, interpersonal skills, problem solving, and citizen
and leadership skills. Each of these
concepts are woven into each of the six core areas (Ohio Department of
Education, 1998). Practical
problem-solving addresses how to deal with complex ethical questions. Possible solutions are analyzed by the consequences on self
and others. Practical action
breaks down each concept into three parts: technical, interpretive, and
reflective. The technical aspect
of a concept is how it is done, or the process.
The interpretative is understanding why and the shared meanings among
the culture, and the reflective is analyzing and evaluating so that the
student can make sound judgments. See
Figure 1 for an illustration of the Work and Family Studies Program in Ohio.
Figure 1 � The High School
Work and Family Life, Middle School Work and Family, and Impact Programs
Note:
Ohio Department of Education Division of Vocational and Adult Education Family
and Consumer Sciences (1998). Work
and family studies an implementation handbook for administrator and teachers.
Columbus: The Ohio State University. p. 8.
FCS Career Curriculum
Ohio�s FCS career education has four priorities and they are:
�Priority
#1: Expand
options for achieving career and educational goals; Priority #2:
Strengthen teaching and learning; Priority #3:
Enhance communication and collaboration with all stakeholders; Priority #4:
Ensure a culture of continuous improvement and innovation� (Ohio Department of Education, 1999b, p.
3).
A few of the critical components of the curriculum include having high
expectations for students, increasing the participation of populations that
are under represented, working with related initiatives such as the
School-to-Work program, creating curriculum maps for the high school level
that link school and work based activities and the integration of content, and
instituting entry and exit points that are flexible and have a multiple focus (Ohio
Department of Education, 1999b).
The career education program has key components within the curriculum
that better explain the expectations of the curriculum itself. They are career pathways, ITAC�s (Integrated Technical and
Academic Competencies), and the use of technology with in the curriculum.
Career Pathways. The career pathways are the educational
experiences that lead to a career specialty.
These experiences can be broke down into academic, technological, and
occupational categories. The
rationale for the career pathways is that all students need to be prepared for
careers and education after high school both academically and technically. Students
also need to be taught a wide range of transferable skills to use in the
ever-changing dynamic market (Ohio Department of Education, 1999b).
Career pathways will link the existing vocational programs and
the post secondary educational options by helping students make informed
decisions in regard to career selection.
Career pathways will help students learn in a context where curriculum
has a career focus academically and technically (Ohio Department of Education,
1999b). Career pathways will also
allow students to select courses and other experiences to better meet their
career goals. This is
accomplished with collaboration of several entities and initiatives, including
the School-to-Work program.
ITAC�s. ITAC�s are the integrated technical and
academic competencies. These are
the curriculum objectives. They
are grouped under the following headings: solving problems and thinking
skillfully, communicating effectively, applying technology, working
responsibly, planning and managing a career, and managing resources.
Under each one of these groups you will find the indicators of the
competencies (Ohio Department of Education, 1999a).
For instance, managing resources contains eleven
competencies. The first is
�apply self-management in the work place,� and it has seven indicators
including an organization system; time, anger, and stress management; an
ergonomic work environment; maintaining productivity through the work
environment; and resource management to obtain goals (Ohio Department of
Education, 1999a).
The
ITAC�s attempt to address all possible learning objectives that would fall
under the career-focused education. The
ITAC�s also address the academic connections of their indicators.
They give a percentage break down of how all of the indicators cover
other academic areas including the arts, math, social studies, language arts,
foreign languages, and sciences (Ohio Department of Education, 1999a).
This break-down can be beneficial in determining how the
career education course relates to proficiency tests.
Integrating Technology. The use of technology allows
students the opportunity to give their education some self-direction (Hayden
& Ley, 1997).
Technology
could be used for many of the objectives found in the career educations
courses. They might include
focusing on a particular career path, cover letters, resumes, interviewing
skills, time management, budgets, job searches, investigation of companies, and
skill analysis. The World Wide
Web offers an abundance of information on these topics, and there are several
software programs that can assist students in these tasks.
Compliance with the School-to-Work Program
The career courses that FCS offers can be considered as part of the
fulfillment of the school-to-work requirements for funding. Typically this course is geared towards sophomores so that
the students can use the information to help them decide
their career major before they become juniors (Gray, 2000). This particular course would only be a small portion of the
school�s entire School-to-Work program because the School-to-Work program has
implications before seventh grade.
Summary
Educators, employers, and the government all concur that there is need for
career education. These entities
believe it is the solution that could offer the students the skills they need
to succeed and have a satisfying life within the world of work.
If the students do not understand the application of these skills or
how they benefit from them personally, then they might not be getting all that
they could out of these types of classes.
Procedure
The purpose of this study was to determine whether high school students found
the Career Education course beneficial to them in regard to life
skills, career selection, and other course work.
Since these classes are new to the high school there has been an
insufficient amount of information gathered and researched on the career
classes offered in the high schools. The
hypothesis of this study is that a majority of students understand several of
the benefits they gain from the class and evaluate the course positively.
Sample
The sample of students came from Madison Comprehensive High School.
The students were enrolled in Mrs. Company�s Life Planning
class. Three of the five classes
received the questionnaire, Career Education Survey.
From the three classes there were twenty-four participants.
The majority of the students were sophomores and juniors and ranged in
age from fifteen to seventeen.
This sample was selected because the students were enrolled
and were almost finished with the career education course at their high
school. It was important for the
participants to be currently enrolled in the course, because the nature of the
course and the technology used is continually being updated.
The sample was limited to three classes to keep data manageable.
Mrs. Company�s first three classes of the day were selected.
Instrument
The instrument used in this research was a questionnaire called
�Career Education Survey� and can be found in Appendix A.
The questionnaire was selected because it was the quickest way to
collect information during a class session with the least disturbance to the
class and school day.
The questionnaire contained ten questions.
Questions one and two asked for demographic information, which was
important in describing the sample. Question
three was asked to determine if the student was coerced into taking the course
or if he or she thought it would be beneficial to him/herself.
Question four asked the students to make a value judgment on the course
objective. Question five tested
one part of the hypothesis. In
this question the student had to select items from the course they thought
would be beneficial to them. Question
six asked them if they could relate any of the skills they have learned to
other classes. This is an
important aspect in understanding if the student understands the benefits of
the class. Question seven asked them if they felt this class would be of
value to them in the future; this is another way to see if the student
understood the benefits of having this class.
With question eight the students were asked to place an importance
on the class in regard to the need of every student taking the same
course. Question nine tested
another part of the hypothesis by asking the students to rate the course by
considering the effectiveness, importance, and the content.
Question ten asked for suggestions on improvements that would be
beneficial when modifying the course for the next semester.
Data Collection Method
The method chosen to collect data consisted of contacting the teacher,
Mrs. Company, who taught the career education course at Madison Comprehensive
High School. After receiving her
permission, the high school principal was contacted; Mr. Pea, and the
vocational administrator, both granted their permission to conduct the survey.
Then, two consecutive days in November were chosen for the survey to be
conducted. On the first day the
students were given a parent�s consent form and were instructed to bring it
to class signed by the next day if they wished to participate in the survey.
The students were told that it was a research project on career
education classes and that they should give honest responses to the questions.
They were also told that their answers were anonymous and could not be
traced back to them. The next day students that returned the parent
consent form were given the questionnaire during the first five minutes of
class.
Data Analysis
All data collected were tallied.
Questions one and two were totaled and the surveys tallied by grade in
addition to an overall tally to see if there was a trend by age and grade.
Questions three and six were totaled and listed by the most common
responses to the least common responses.
Questions four, seven, and eight responses were totaled and
averaged. Question 10 responses
were listed and the three most common responses were discussed.
Because
question five and nine tested the hypothesis, both had to meet the
following criteria to accept the hypothesis.
Question five had to have at least five of the seventeen options checked
by seventy-five percent of the participants.
Of the five items checked there had to be at least one item checked in
each category by seventy-five percent of the students.
In addition, question nine was totaled and averaged and had to have an average of 3.75 or higher. If
the criteria were met on both question five and nine then the hypothesis was accepted.
Results
and Discussion
Demographic Information
The twenty-four students who participated in the survey ranged in age
from fifteen to seventeen. The
ages were as follows: 13 out of
24 participants were fifteen years old; 9 participants were sixteen
years old; and 2 participants were seventeen years old.
The majority of these students were sophomores (21 out of 24
participants) but there also was 1 junior and two seniors.
Reasons For Taking The Course
The majority of students (15 of 24 surveyed) chose to take the course
because they thought they would benefit from it.
Students also took the course because they thought it would be easy (10
of 24 surveyed) and because a previous student recommended it (10 of 24
surveyed). Eight of the
students needed another class in their schedule and 7 of 24 students stated
that a counselor recommended the course.
Only three of the students said a friend recommended they take the
course, while none of the students took the course on a parent�s
recommendation. This information
is presented in Figure 2, which indicates the response of why students choose
to take the Life Planning Course.
Figure 2 - Student�s Reasons for Taking the Course (n=24)
Skills and Benefits
A majority of students (15 of 24) believed that it was very important to learn
the skills of career selection, while 9 of the 24 students believed it was
somewhat important, and none believed it was unimportant. Twenty-one of the twenty-four students felt the class would
help them in the future, but only nine of the twenty-four thought it should be
required for graduation.
Not all of the students believed that they had learned skills that
would
apply to other course work. Twelve
of twenty-four students believed that they would use the computer skills they
learned in this class in other course work; ten of twenty-four students
believed that they would use the internet skills they learned in this class in
other course work; eleven of twenty-four students believed that they would use
the research process they learned in this class in other course work; nine of
twenty-four students believed that they would use the problem solving skills
they learned in this class in other course work; six of twenty-four students
believed that they would use the resume writing skills they learned in this
class in other course work; eleven of twenty-four students believed that they
would use the budgeting skills they learned in this class in other coursework.
The students were given a list of concepts in three
different categories. The
categories were life skills, career selection, and application to other course
work. A majority of students (19
of 24) checked five or more of these concepts, and 15 of the 24 participants
checked at least one item from each category.
Table 1 lists each of the concepts and the number of students who
checked that response. It indicates the number of students who believed that
the following concepts would be beneficial to them in the future.
Table 1 - Concepts Students Find Beneficial For the
Future (n=24)
Overall Rating and Comments
The course received an average rating of 3.54 (out of 5) with 7 of the
24 students giving it a rating of 5; 6 giving it a rating
of 4; 6 giving it a rating of 3; 3 giving it a rating of 2; and 2 giving it a rating of 1.
Of the twenty-four students only ten made comments.
Five of the ten who made comments said that the class was boring or
needed to be made more interesting. Two
of the ten comments pertained to job shadowing and two suggested more
field trips. The following is a
complete list of comments.
�
I think there should be more job shadowing or trips to actually
get out in your interested field to see what it�s like.
�
Don�t be boring and have more fun.
�
Field Trips for everyone.
�
To go on more field trips.
�
This class is so boring! I shouldn�t have taken it.
When you do it, make it fun.
�
Since I am a senior, a lot of the vocational studies we spent a
lot of time on do not affect me, since I am already enrolled in cosmetology.
Maybe they could have a Life Planning just for seniors.
�
Make more interesting. (Too much talking.)
Go around and visit, see what classes we should be taking next year,
see what they are like.
�
Make it more interesting.
�
No, I think its fine. I
would have job shadowing be something that we had to do for a project though.
�
To make it more interesting, but I like it.
Summary of Results
Students did believe that the
course was and will be of benefit to them in the future, just not to the
extent to accept the hypothesis. For
the hypothesis to be accepted two criteria had to be met. First, at least five of the possible seventeen benefits had
to be selected and each of the three categories must of had at least one item
checked by seventy-five percent of the participants (18).
Second, the average overall rating had to be at least a 3.75.
Nineteen of the twenty-four participants did select five or more of the
benefits, but only fifteen of the twenty-four students checked at least one
item from each category. For the
second part of the hypothesis the average overall rating was a 3.54. Therefore
the hypothesis was rejected.
Discussion
Overall, students believed that
it was important to take this course for their future.
They knew that they would benefit from the concepts that are taught,
especially in regards to career selection.
Although students knew that they would benefit, they did not understand what
the benefits were. At
best only half of the students could relate the skills they were learning in
this course to other coursework. Of
the six applicable skill choices, all were skills that carry over to other
coursework, including but not limited to the sciences, mathematics, language
arts, and social sciences.
The top four ranking benefits
were learning how to select a college or technical school, select a career
path, research a job, and self-management and work ethics.
This was encouraging because the students chose the most important
concepts as benefits. At the same
time students rated networking and resume writing as low benefits in the course.
That is probably because they did not comprehend the power of those
concepts in obtaining employment within their chosen career.
The overall rating of the
course was affected by the lack of interesting presentations of information. At this time the course was still so new to this school
district that the teacher was still working on the content and had not had the
chance to spice up the presentation or student acquisition of information.
I suspect that if the students were just asked to rate the course on the
content it would have received a higher rating.
The implications of this study were that students understand some of
the benefits they gained from the Life Planning Course and they need to be
educated on the importance of some of the other concepts that are covered within
the course, such as networking and resumes.
Since students know that they will benefit from the course and previous
students are recommending the course, it appears that the school will have no
problem keeping
a high enrollment in this course.
Students
believed learning how to fill out job applications and college applications to
be a benefit of this course. This
proves that even though society might consider these skills to be common
sense, the students think they should be taught in the classroom.
The biggest challenge the teacher of this course faces is how to add
more appeal and zest to the course itself.
Students have suggested more field trips into the career world; this
might be a good place to start.
One of the
limitations of this study was that students had to be relied upon to get their
parental consent forms signed and return them the following day to
participate. Only 40% of the
students returned the parental consent form signed.
Another limitation of the study was that the students had not finished
the semester; therefore they did not understand all of the terminology and
concepts presented on the questionnaire.
Crowson, Wong,
and Aypay (2000) stated that career opportunities are becoming more diverse
and it is time to move from a standardized education to one that allows
students to see and participate in real-world applications.
Even some of the participants in this survey addressed the need for more
field trips to see what is out there in the career world.
One student commented that job shadowing should not be an option for
this class but a requirement. These
students wanted more opportunities see careers and employment in real-world
applications instead of the traditional lecture.
Gray (2000) stated that the School-to-Work program provided no
provisions for the education of interpersonal skills.
The Family and Consumer Sciences Curriculum has not only integrated
this concept into its curriculum, but has created a whole strand called
�working responsibly� within the career focused ITACs (Ohio Department of
Education, 1999a).
Mrs. Company
has worked this concept into the content of her course, and a majority of
students believed that addressing this concept in this class would benefit them
in the future.
Smith, Hall, Jones, Cory, and Etheridge (1998) claimed that students
can see the relevance of learning job skills and recognize that they are
lacking in these skills. Not only
did a majority of the participants feel that career selection was a very
important skill to learn, but also twenty-one out of twenty-four knew that
this class would be of help to them in the future.
Therefore the participants of this study agreed with the statements
of Smith et. al.
Because of the nature of the course, technology is a must to keep up
with the ever-changing world of work. Hayden
and Ley (1997) claim that technology allows students to give their education
some self-direction. In this
class technology allowed students to customize their education selection and
research of a career path, job searches, and resume writing. Unfortunately, only half of the students that participated in
this study could see how computer skills could be linked to other course work,
and less than half understood the benefit of computer skills and Internet uses
for their future.
Conclusions and Recommendations
Conclusions of the Study
Overall, students believed that it was important to take this course for their
future. Students also
believed learning how to fill out job applications and college applications to
be an asset of this course. Unfortunately, students rated networking, and resume
writing low, because they did not comprehend the power of these concepts in
obtaining employment within their chosen career. The overall rating of the course was affected by the lack of
interesting presentations of information and concepts.
The hypothesis of this study was that a majority of students would understood several
of the benefits they gained from the class and evaluate the course positively.
To accept the hypothesis, at least five of the possible seventeen
benefits had to be selected and each of the three categories must have had at
least one item checked by seventy-five of the participants (18). Also, the average overall rating for the course had to be at
least a 3.75 (out of five). Nineteen
of the twenty-four participants did select five or more of the benefits, but
only fifteen of the twenty-four students checked at least one item from each
category. For the second part of
the hypothesis the average overall rating was a 3.54 (out of five), therefore
the hypothesis was rejected.
The effectiveness of the research was compromised by the lack of participation
of those students who failed to return the parental consent form. To have only twenty-four students represent a course that is offered by
two teachers for a total of eight class periods a day is not a fair
representation of the Life Planning Course. The survey would have been much more effective had it been administered
during the last week of class when the students had finished conducting their
research on the career of their choice, but the data was collected earlier to
enable the researcher to complete the study in one semester. The research process
tied together all of the information they have
learned throughout the course and allowed the student to apply it in a real-world application. After
completing this process the student might have a better perception of the
benefits of the course and they might have rated it higher.
Recommendations for Further Study
1. Repeat the same study
�High School Career Education: Student�s Perceptions of the Life Planning
Course� at Madison High School using a larger sample, a different school
district, or several school districts.
2. Conduct a study on the
different FCS curriculums at different schools and whether or not they meet
the criteria for the School-to-Work program and follow the FCS Career Focused
ITACs.
3. Conduct a study that
evaluates the student�s needs or identifies the student�s difficulties
within the career education courses, that
identifies the top ten employer�s needs of a student that graduates with a
tech prep degree, or that
identifies employer�s top ten problems in regards to the employment of high
school students.
4. Conduct a study in
which teachers evaluate the resources available to teach career education
courses or evaluate the student�s success with the career education
course.
References
Austin,
E. (2000). No place like home.
American School Board Journal, 44-47.
Cory,
J., Ethridge, T., Hall, H., Jones, K, & Smith, B. (1998).
Students: Consumers of family and consumer sciences.
Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 15-17.
Crowson,
R., Wong, K., & Aypay, A. (2000). The
quiet reform in American education: Policy issues and conceptual challenges in
the school-to-work transition. Educational
Policy, 14, 2, 241-259
Gordon,
E. (2000).
Help wanted: Creating tomorrow�s work force. Futurist, 34, 48-53.
Gray,
D. (2000).
Shaping America�s workforce for the new millennium.
Education, 120, 631-634.
Guest,
JR., & Charles, L. (2000). School-to-work
program. Education, 120,
4, 614-621.
Hayden,
M., & Ley, C. (1997). Collaborating
with technology: Teaching a class on the World Wide Web.
Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences, 89, 25-27.
Krumboltz,
J., & Worthington, R. (1999). The
school-to-work transition from a learning theory perspective.
The Career Development Quarterly, 47, 312-325.
Ohio
Department of Education Division of Vocational and Adult Education Family and
Consumer Sciences (1999a). ITAC
integrated technical and academic competencies for career-focused education.
Columbus: The Ohio State University.
Ohio
Department of Education Division of Vocational and Adult Education Family and
Consumer Sciences (1999b). Career
pathways implementation guide. Columbus:
The Ohio State University.
Ohio
Department of Education Division of Vocational and Adult Education Family and
Consumer Sciences (1998). Work
and family studies an implementation handbook for administrator and teachers.
Columbus: The Ohio State University.
Savickas,
M. (1999). The transition from
school to work: A developmental perspective.
The Career Development Quarterly, 47, 326-336.
Appendix
A
CAREER EDUCATION SURVEY
-
What is your grade level? ___________
-
How old are you? _______
-
Why are you taking this course? (Please check all that apply.)
___ Parent�s recommendation
___ Counselor�s recommendation
___ Friend�s recommendation
___ Recommendation from a previous student who took
the course
___ Thought it would be easy
___ Thought I would benefit from the course
___ Needed another class in my schedule
-
How important is it to learn the skills of career selection?
___
Very Important ___
Somewhat Important ___
Unimportant
-
Please
check the topics covered in this class that you feel will be beneficial
to you in the future. (Please
check all that apply.)
___
Budgeting
___ Writing a
resume
___ Being
interviewed
___ Filling out
a job application
___ Self-management and work ethics
___ Networking (to obtain employment)
___ Filling out a college application
___ Community
service
2.
Career
Selection
___ Selecting a career path
___ Researching a job
___Deciding
whether or not to attend college
___ Selecting a
college or technical school
___ Finding a job (job search)
3. Application to Other Course Work
___ Computer skills
___ Internet searches and uses
___ The research process
___ Problem solving
6. What skills have you learned from this class that you have used or
think you will use in other
coursework?
(Please check all that apply.)
___ Computer skills
___ Internet searches and uses
___ The research process
___ Problem solving
___ Writing a resume
___ Budgeting
For Questions 7 � 9 please circle your
response.
- Do you feel that this class will help you in the future?
Yes No
- Should this class be required for graduation?
Yes No
- Please
give this class an overall rating considering effectiveness, importance,
and content of the class. (Five is the highest.)
J 5
4
3
2
1
L
- Do
you have any suggestions on improvement for this class?