The Role of Stretching in a Warm-Up
Deirdre McFate
California University of Pennsylvania
Abstract
This paper discusses the role of stretching in a warm-up protocol. Four types of stretching are defined and evaluated
based on the acute and long-term effects they have on flexibility and performance measurements.
The Purpose of a Warm-Up
Stretching protocols are a key component of
a pre-activity warm-up. Protocols associated with stretching have evolved over the years in order to be effective
for a specific sport. However, there are numerous side effects of stretching which may limit performance in some
athletes, and these effects may not be widely known. Certified athletic trainers need to be aware of these effects
in order to provide the best possible care for their patients on and off the field.
An important aspect of pre-activity is the warm-up. Warm-ups can be either passive or active, with the
main goal being to increase the muscle temperature without causing fatigue.1 The commonly accepted theory
is that increasing the temperature of a muscle will help enhance tissue flexibility.2 Passive warm-ups
occur when the internal body temperature is increased due to an outside force acting on the body such as a sauna
or hot tub. Active warm-ups occur when the body itself is acting to increase internal temperature and can be of
two kinds: general warm-up and specific warm-up.
General warm-ups consist of non-specific body movements such as jogging, cycling, or callisthenics.1
On the other hand, specific warm-ups target the movements that are specific to the sport and use those activities
to increase the internal body temperature while preparing for the activity.1 Stretching is often included in a
warm-up, whether it is static at the end of the warm-up, dynamic at the beginning, or is used throughout the warm-up.
In order to achieve optimal performance, a pre-activity protocol should systematically and progressively stimulate
the musculature used during the activity3 The theoretical goal of an active warm-up is to optimize performance
and reduce the incidence of injury through increased muscle temperature, muscle compliance, and efficiency of physiological
responses.3 Pre-activity protocols typically include a combination of warm-up and stretching. The optimal
time frame in which to stretch for an activity is sport-specific, as the varying types of stretching produce different
physiological effects on the body. Stretching can be broken down into four basic categories: static, ballistic,
dynamic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF). Each of these types of stretching can fit into a
warm-up; however there are times in the warm-up when one type may be more beneficial than another.
Types of Stretching
Static stretching is often referred to as slow
or passive stretching1 and occurs when there is a slow and controlled movement to the end range of motion. The
position is held for a length of time (typically 20-30 seconds), and the muscle is moved back to the natural position.1
The stretch is then repeated several times to increase the end point in the muscle and connective tissue. This
stretch is designed to lengthen the plastic (non-recoiling) connective tissue to achieve the greatest increase
in permanent elongation.
Ballistic stretching is one form of active stretching,
but the method used to perform this type of stretching may lead to an increased risk for injury.2 This type
of stretching utilizes the weight of a body part ( i.e., arm, leg, trunk) in order to move past the end range of motion
and gain a greater muscle length.2 Once the end range of motion is achieved, the body part is then “bounced” repetitively
to push the muscle further past the end range of motion. Ballistic stretching may cause muscle injury, because the muscle
is forcefully stretched. During ballistic stretching, the muscle is stretched at a fast rate and then rebounded back repetitively,
resulting in greater tension and more absorbed energy within the muscle–tendon unit.2
Dynamic stretching is also a form of active stretching,
but it is much more controlled than ballistic stretching. Dynamic stretching utilizes the principle of reciprocal inhibition
in order to relax one muscle while its antagonist is contracted, pulling the muscle through the range of motion without
forcefully pushing it past the end range of motion.2 For example, the hamstring group actively contracts resulting
in the inhibited quadriceps group causing the muscle group to be stretched. Motions such as arm circles and high knees
fall into the dynamic stretching category. Dynamic stretching can easily be added into a warm-up routine and might be a
useful protocol for increasing flexibility without decreasing athletic performance.2
Proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation (PNF) stretching
uses the principle of reciprocal interaction between agonist and antagonist muscles as well and it is a key component in
PNF stretching. Reciprocal inhibition is the principle that the sensory signal that causes a contraction of agonist muscle
also causes an inhibitory response in the antagonist of that muscle.2 When the antagonist muscle is inhibited,
it will be stretched in the opposite direction more easily.2 There are several different methods of PNF stretching,
including slow-reversal-hold, contract-relax, and hold-relax.2 The muscle is passively moved to the end range
of motion, and then the antagonist muscle isometrically contracts to inhibit the stretched muscle.1 After the isometric
muscle contraction of the antagonist, the muscle is again stretched. The contractility of muscles provides the flexibility
in the PNF technique, on the basis of the viscoelastic properties of muscle and neuromuscular facilitation.2 The
contracted muscle lengthens the noncontractile elements (perimysium, endomysium, tendon) and, consequently, causes a relaxation
of the muscle–tendon unit and decreased
passive tension in the muscle.2 The contracted muscle also stimulates sensory receptors within the muscle: muscle
spindles (negative stretch reflex) and Golgi tendon organs (GTOs) that help to relax, or inhibit, the tensed muscle; as
a consequence, the muscle–tendon-unit becomes more relaxed after the contraction.2
Effects of Stretching on Flexibility
Stretching has effects on an acute and long-term
level of flexibility, and both static and dynamic flexibility can be achieved. Static flexibility is defined as
the available range of motion (ROM) to a joint or series of joints, while dynamic flexibility refers to the ease
of movement within the obtainable ROM.4 Several studies have been conducted in order to determine the
acute and long-term effects that various stretching protocols have on flexibility.
Two different studies5, 6 determined that static, ballistic,
and dynamic stretching cause increases in flexibility measurements on an acute level. Static stretching created the greatest
increase in flexibility, while ballistic and dynamic stretching produce minimal changes in flexibility. It was also found
that dynamic stretching could cause decreases in flexibility if performed following a warm-up. These types of stretching
clearly create changes in acute flexibility; however, chronic flexibility is also an important aspect to look at when evaluating
stretching protocols.
Overall flexibility is considered an important aspect
of fitness. Chronic increases in flexibility are synonymous with decreased tissue stiffness, and some researchers have
stated that an increase in ROM does not necessarily indicate a decrease in passive stiffness, only an increased ”stretch
tolerance. ”4 A number of studies7,8 have examined the chronic effects of stretching on flexibility. These studies
reached two separate conclusions; the first found no flexibility increases from either dynamic or static stretching, while
the second found significant increases in flexibility from static stretching. These differences may be due to the methods
used to conduct the research. The former study evaluated flexibility based on stretching included in a warm-up while the
latter study used an extensive static stretching protocol. Because the results came from different interventions, they
can both be accurate for that given situation. Obviously, stretching protocols have an effect on flexibility measurements
in subjects. Performance is perhaps a more important aspect to examine. Athletes do not want their performance to
be compromised due to the stretching protocol, which could have a profound effect.
Effects of Acute and Chronic Stretching on Performance
The type of activity must be taken into consideration when determining whether there is any effect on performance
from stretching. For example, a protocol that may cause a decrease in the performance of a strength and power activity
could present a positive influence on endurance activity or on athletes that are working for flexibility. Activities
such as sprinting and weight lifting fall under the category of strength and power, and activities such as diving,
dancing, and gymnastics fall into the category of athletes that are working for flexibility.2
As with flexibility, stretching has an effect on performance
on an acute and long-term level. The acute effects have been studied in more depth, and the majority of research has drawn
the same conclusion. The general consensus of numerous studies was that static stretching causes a decrease in strength
and power performance and that dynamic stretching causes no negative side effects. 5,9,10-14 These studies used
different methods to evaluate the effect of stretching interventions on the performance of strength and power activities.
Measurements such as sprint times, 11,13,14 power exercises, 5,10 and agility activities,9,12 have
determined the effects different stretching protocols have on acute performance measurements. In the studies, the researchers
found that static stretching reduced the performance of power activities for at least 15 minutes post-stretch. The results
of PNF stretching came to the same conclusion, although the performance decreases were not as large. Ballistic stretching
was found to have a minimal effect on performance, and dynamic stretching showed the greatest increase in performance measurements.
These results show the acute effects of stretching on performance as well as long-term performance. Although dynamic stretching
leads to performance increases on an acute level, it may not contribute to long-term performance measurements. Static,
ballistic, and PNF stretching protocols also need to be evaluated in order to determine the optimal protocols for long-term
performance increases.
An extensive study of 24 collegiate wrestlers compared
the effects of static and dynamic stretching on overall performance after four weeks of intervention.7 Significant
increases in overall performance measurements in the dynamic stretching group were reported, with no change in the static
stretching group.
In general, static stretching leads to the greatest long term increases in flexibility. Increases in
flexibility can lead to increases in performance in some activities but decreasing performance in other areas.
Female gymnasts require a dramatic ROM in many movements, while soccer players may benefit more from having “tighter” muscles.4
Each sport has different requirements of an athlete, and within that sport there are positions that require a variety
of attributes. Goalkeepers in soccer display increased flexibility when compared to their team counterparts, and
soccer players as a whole are tighter than the general non-soccer population.4 Swimmers have displayed
an increase in flexibility in their ankles and shoulders, and baseball pitchers have an increase in external rotation
of the shoulder. These differences in flexibility may be due to the stored energy potential in the elastic structures
of a muscle.4 In other words, the tighter an athlete is, the more potential energy. Because profiles
of athletes appear to indicate specific flexibility patterns associated both between and within sports, evidence
exists that flexibility must be related to sports performance.4 One surprising study measured the economy
of walking and running in subjects with varying levels of flexibility. The study used ml O2/kg/m as the measurement
for economy, and the researchers found that once speeds exceeded the normal walking pace of 4.8 km/h the subjects
with the “tightest” flexibility
measurements were the most economical.4 This study brought to light some surprising information. Although
increased flexibility is important for performance in some sports that rely on extremes of motion for movement
such as gymnastics and diving, decreased flexibility may actually increase economy of movement in sports that use
only the mid portion of ROM.4
Summary
A key component in a pre-activity warm-up is
a stretching protocol. Different stretching protocols, both acute and chronic, have a profound effect on the flexibility
and performance of athletes. When developing a stretching program, the type of activity must be taken into
consideration as each type of stretching produces different physiological effects. Athletic trainers should avoid
statically stretching their athletes before activity and instead perform dynamic stretching. They also need to
know how to improve long-term flexibility using static stretching post activity. In order to provide an optimal
stretching protocol, the demands of the activity need to be evaluated and a program developed based on the protocol
that has been determined to be optimal for that type of activity.
References
- Woods K, Bishop P, Jones E. Warm-up and stretching in the prevention of muscular injury. Sports Med. 2007;
37(12): 1089-1099.
- Weerapong P, Hume PA, Kolt GS. Stretching: mechanisms and benefits for sport performance
and injury prevention. Physical
Therapy Reviews. 2004; 9(4): 159-206.
- Judge LW, Craig B, Baudendistal S, Bodey KJ. An examination of
the stretching practices of division I and division III college football programs in the Midwestern United
States. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;
23(4): 1091-1096.
- Gleim GW, McHugh MP. Flexibility and its effects on sports injury and performance. Sports
Med. 1997;
24(5): 289-299.
- Bacurau RFP, Monteiro GA, Ugrinowitsch C, Tricoli V, Cabral LF, Aoki MS. Acute effect of
a ballistic and a static stretching exercise bout on flexibility and maximal strength. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;
23(1): 304-308.
- O’Sullivan K, Murray E, Sainsbury D. The effect of warm-up, static stretching and dynamic
stretching on hamstring flexibility in previously injured subjects. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2009;
10: 37-46.
- Herman SL, Smith DT. Four-week dynamic stretching warm-up intervention elicits longer-term performance
benefits. J
Strength Cond Res. 2008; 22(4): 1286-1297.
- Bandy WD, Irion JM, Briggler M. The effect of time and frequency
of static stretching on the flexibility of the hamstring muscles. Physical Therapy. 1997; 77(10):
1090-1096.
- McMillian D, Moore J, Hatler B, Taylor D. Dynamic vs. static-stretching warm up: The effect on
power and agility performance. J of Strength Cond Res. 2006; 20(3): 492-499.
- Bradley PS, Olsen PD,
Portas MD. The effect of static, ballistic, and proprioceptive neuromuscular facilitation stretching on vertical
jump performance. J of Strength Cond Res. 2007; 21(1): 223-226.
- Fletcher IM, Anness R. The acute
effects of combined static and dynamic stretch protocols on fifty-meter sprint performance in track-and-field
athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2007; 21(3): 784-787.
- Little T, Williams AG. Effects of differential
stretching protocols during warm-ups on high-speed motor capacities in professional soccer players. J Strength
Cond Res. 2006; 20(1): 203-207
- Winchester JB, Nelson AG, Landin D, Young MA, Schexnayder IC. Static
stretching impairs sprint performance in collegiate track and field athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;
22(1): 13-18.
- Stewart M, Adams R, Alonso A, Van Koesveld B, Campbell S. Warm- up or stretch as preparation
for sprint performance? J
Science and Med in Sport. 2007; 10(6): 403-410.
|